The Yen Kuan-heng corruption case may end his political career. On Thursday, the High Court confirmed earlier rulings against the Kuomintang lawmaker.
The court upheld Yen’s convictions for forgery and larceny. He still appeals the corruption charge. If the court ultimately confirms it, Yen will lose his legislative seat.
Prosecutors accused Yen of orchestrating a sham property sale in Taichung’s Shalu District. He illegally built the mansion on state-owned land and then tried to cover it up. He allegedly collaborated with his assistant and a design firm to fake the transaction.
Prosecutors also said Yen collected assistant subsidies fraudulently. He listed an assistant who did not perform work to receive government payments. Lin’s spouse compiled a detailed salary summary that prosecutors used as evidence.
Yen rejected the court’s ruling, claiming politicians targeted him. He argued investigators acted soon after he announced his 2024 legislative campaign. He denied any intent to defraud the government.
Yen insisted his assistant performed real duties. He said he paid assistants from his own pocket. He added that media pressure forced him to sell the property.
Political analysts say the Yen Kuan-heng corruption case highlights Taiwan’s oversight challenges. If the court confirms the corruption conviction, authorities will automatically disqualify him. The ruling underscores accountability in public office.
Legal experts noted the case demonstrates the court’s growing focus on financial misconduct among lawmakers. They say transparency and proper record-keeping remain crucial.
Yen plans to appeal the corruption charge. Meanwhile, voters and lawmakers follow the case closely. Public opinion remains divided, with some questioning the timing of the investigation. Others insist the law should apply equally to all politicians.
The Yen Kuan-heng corruption case continues to attract national attention. Experts believe it could set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future. Lawmakers may review internal procedures to prevent misuse of subsidies.
Public interest in the case remains high. Social media discussions highlight growing concern about corruption and fairness in politics. Analysts predict the outcome could influence Taiwan’s next election campaigns.
In conclusion, Yen’s political career hangs in the balance. Forgery and larceny convictions remain, but the corruption ruling will decide his ultimate fate. Citizens and politicians alike now wait for the final verdict.
