South Korean government reorganization sparked intense clashes between the two main parties. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea introduced a bill to split the prosecution and remove the Finance Ministry’s budget-planning authority. Meanwhile, last-minute talks with the main opposition, the People Power Party, failed to produce any compromise. Consequently, tensions rose sharply in the National Assembly. Furthermore, both parties blamed each other for the legislative deadlock.
The revision to the Government Organization Act includes abolishing the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and dividing its authority. One new agency will handle investigations, and another will manage indictments. In addition, lawmakers plan to separate the budget office from the Finance Ministry. The Democratic Party said it would drop its plan to overhaul the top financial regulator. However, the Financial Services Commission and Financial Supervisory Service remain unchanged. Even so, the parties could not reach an agreement.
As soon as the bill was introduced, the People Power Party launched a filibuster against all reform bills proposed by the ruling party. By law, each filibuster lasts up to 24 hours and requires a three-fifths majority to end. Each bill needs a separate vote to end the filibuster, meaning realistically, lawmakers can only pass one bill per day. As a result, South Korean government reorganization faces delays. Both sides continued to accuse each other of obstruction.
Amid the escalating political struggle, the National Assembly passed a resolution pledging full state support for the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Lawmakers vowed to use the event to promote peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula. In addition, both parties acknowledged the importance of international engagement despite internal disputes. Transitioning focus between domestic reform and global diplomacy remains a challenge for lawmakers.
The ruling party emphasizes that South Korean government reorganization is crucial for transparency and efficiency. Meanwhile, the opposition warns that rapid changes could create instability. Both sides insist on protecting their political priorities. Consequently, the legislative process may continue to face delays until parties reach a compromise. In the meantime, citizens and international partners closely watch the outcome.
