In a bold political move, Nippon Ishin no Kai has renewed calls to establish a second capital in Osaka. This push comes as part of broader demands for decentralization and regional reform. It reflects growing dissatisfaction with Tokyo’s dominance over national decision-making. The proposal aims to shift some central government functions to Osaka, Japan’s second-largest metropolitan area. Party leaders say the move would reduce over-concentration in Tokyo, while giving western Japan more administrative power.
The second capital plan was included in Ishin’s policy platform earlier this year. It coincides with the party’s broader push for education reform, tax adjustments, and streamlined public services. By proposing a geographic shift in power, Ishin seeks to redefine how the national government operates. This announcement arrives at a critical political juncture. The ruling coalition lacks a firm majority in the Lower House, forcing them to engage with opposition parties to secure key legislation. Ishin’s support has become essential in budget negotiations.
In recent talks, Ishin helped pass the fiscal 2025 budget after securing commitments on education subsidies and social security changes. These deals gave the party greater influence in shaping national priorities. The second capital idea is now being discussed as a condition for further cooperation. Osaka Governor Hirofumi Yoshimura, who also serves as Ishin’s co-leader, emphasized that decentralization is a core goal. He said Osaka is ready to house parts of the national administration and would work to prepare the necessary infrastructure.
However, critics argue the plan is unrealistic and costly. Officials in Tokyo point to the logistical challenges of splitting ministries and duplicating functions. Some also warn it could disrupt bureaucratic cohesion and policy execution. Still, supporters of the second capital concept say Japan must break from its Tokyo-centric model. They believe the move could unlock growth in neglected regions and improve resilience during natural disasters.
Political analysts suggest the proposal is more than symbolic. It signals Ishin’s growing ambition and its desire to shape long-term governance reform. They say the plan could appeal to voters frustrated by slow reforms and regional inequality. Looking ahead, Ishin plans to keep the issue at the center of coalition talks and future elections. Whether the second capital idea becomes reality will depend on public support, party negotiations, and sustained political will.
