South Korean President Lee Jae Myung presented a gold crown gift to US President Donald Trump, igniting global debate. The gift, a replica of a Silla-era crown from the Cheonmachong Tomb in Gyeongju, combines cultural symbolism with diplomatic strategy. Lee also awarded Trump the Order of Mugunghwa, South Korea’s highest honor, during the summit on Wednesday.
The replica used about one kilogram of gold, worth roughly 187 million won ($131,000). Critics questioned the timing, noting recent “No Kings” protests across the United States. Over 2,600 cities hosted rallies on October 18, including Times Square in New York. Protesters opposed monarchical symbolism and celebrity adoration.
Supporters defended the gold crown gift as pragmatic diplomacy. They cited Trump’s known love for gold and grandeur, which could influence ongoing trade talks. Hyundai and other South Korean firms could gain from tariff reductions negotiated during the summit.
Online reactions in South Korea were mixed. Some felt embarrassed by the gesture, while others saw it as a strategic investment in national interests. Analysts suggested the gift symbolized a blend of culture and practical negotiation.
The gold crown gift highlights tension between ceremonial gestures and tangible economic benefits. By using a culturally significant artifact, President Lee sought to honor the US leader and advance Korea’s strategic goals simultaneously.
Experts said the modest cost of the gold crown gift could be offset by major trade gains. Reducing tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent could save Korean companies trillions of won.
The controversy surrounding the gold crown gift may influence future diplomatic protocols. Officials will likely weigh cultural appropriateness alongside political and economic objectives in upcoming international exchanges.
Moving forward, observers will watch whether ceremonial diplomacy continues to balance symbolism, public perception, and pragmatic negotiation.
