South Korea is pursuing constitutional reform to prevent abuse of executive power. The new presidency prioritizes revising the Constitution of the Sixth Republic, adopted in 1987. President Lee Jae-myung emphasizes citizen participation and institutional balance in the reform process. The administration seeks to correct vulnerabilities that allowed excessive presidential authority. Public debate intensifies as opposition voices challenge the proposed changes.
The reform initiative follows the impeachment of former President Yoon Suk Yeol, who declared martial law before leaving office. His departure ended six months of political turmoil and created momentum for constitutional change. Critics labeled his actions an example of “imperial presidency,” arguing that the Constitution grants too much power to a single executive. The reform aims to prevent similar crises by adjusting presidential powers relative to the National Assembly and judiciary. Lawmakers and citizens engage in discussions to ensure the amendments reflect democratic principles.
President Lee has not set a strict timeline for constitutional reform, but his administration stresses urgency. Lawmakers in the Democratic Party, which holds a majority in the National Assembly, support reform that reduces presidential overreach. The administration wants to establish a more balanced system while maintaining government efficiency. Observers note that revising a constitution crafted after decades of military rule requires careful negotiation and transparency. South Korea’s democratic legacy motivates leaders to protect civil rights while strengthening institutional checks.
The political deadlock preceding martial law highlighted the need for reform. Yoon’s administration clashed with the Democratic-majority legislature, which blocked budget approvals and dismissed senior officials. These tensions revealed weaknesses in the constitutional design that allowed a concentration of executive authority. Reform supporters argue that constitutional change can prevent political gridlock while safeguarding citizens from unilateral decisions. Furthermore, the reform process could enhance public trust by encouraging broader civic participation in governance.
Overall, South Korea’s push for constitutional reform reflects both lessons from past crises and forward-looking governance. Leaders aim to create a system where power balances between the presidency, legislature, and judiciary. Citizens, political parties, and experts participate in shaping amendments to strengthen democracy. By addressing institutional weaknesses, South Korea hopes to prevent future abuse of executive power and reinforce stability.
