South Korea has strongly objected to Japan’s latest defense white paper, which claims sovereignty over the Dokdo islets. Known as Takeshima in Japan, these small rocky islands have fueled decades of political tension. The South Korean Foreign Ministry issued a firm response, condemning Tokyo’s stance as provocative and baseless.
A ministry spokesperson declared that Dokdo remains “undeniably South Korean territory under historical, geographical, and international law.” Seoul also warned of strong diplomatic measures if Japan continues pressing its claim. Officials stressed their commitment to defending the nation’s sovereignty and territorial rights without compromise.
The 2025 Japanese white paper reiterated the country’s claim to Takeshima while describing South Korea as a partner for global challenges. Analysts believe this wording reflects Japan’s attempt to balance territorial assertions with the need for security cooperation. However, Seoul views the statement as contradictory and damaging to bilateral trust.
The Dokdo dispute Korea highlights longstanding historical grievances between the neighbors, including the legacy of Japan’s colonial rule. While both countries maintain robust trade and shared security interests, territorial disputes often stall progress in diplomatic relations.
South Korea’s coast guard maintains a permanent presence on Dokdo, strengthening Seoul’s administrative control. Japan continues to lodge formal protests against these measures, insisting the islets fall under its jurisdiction. This regular exchange of claims reinforces tensions whenever official documents revive the issue.
Despite Japan’s mention of partnership in the white paper, Seoul rejects any suggestion that compromises its sovereignty. The South Korean Foreign Ministry reaffirmed its intention to act firmly through diplomatic channels and international forums. Experts warn that unresolved territorial rows like Dokdo could undermine broader cooperation.
The Dokdo dispute Korea has gained renewed attention as global allies encourage Seoul and Tokyo to collaborate on regional security. North Korea’s growing missile threats and China’s influence highlight the importance of unity. Yet, the territorial standoff remains a major obstacle to deeper strategic ties.
Public sentiment in South Korea remains strongly opposed to Japan’s claim. Demonstrations and social media campaigns often surge when Tokyo reiterates its position. This widespread national support underscores how Dokdo symbolizes Korea’s fight against historical injustices and its sovereignty today.
In recent years, leaders from both countries have made efforts to improve relations. However, disputes like Dokdo demonstrate how fragile progress can be. Observers believe resolving such issues requires political courage and sustained dialogue beyond official statements.
The latest white paper signals that Japan may continue its claims for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, South Korea shows no signs of backing down. The situation reflects the delicate balance both nations must manage between cooperation and rivalry.
