In South Korea, the special counsel team has requested a detention warrant for former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min. Authorities accuse him of serious crimes related to alleged government overreach and constitutional violations. These charges include abuse of power, obstruction, and aiding martial law orders.
Special counsel investigators stated that Lee may have supported former President Yoon Suk Yeol’s controversial martial law plans. He allegedly helped implement those orders instead of blocking them. This action could have violated his duty as a Cabinet member to defend the constitution.
The power abuse case also includes charges of ordering the shutdown of utilities at several media companies. Investigators claim Lee instructed the National Fire Agency to cut electricity and water supplies. The listed organizations include multiple broadcasters and newspapers critical of the administration.
According to the special counsel team, Lee received these orders directly from then-President Yoon. He reportedly obeyed them without resistance. This raises concerns about constitutional violations, media suppression, and obstruction of press freedom.
In addition, investigators accuse Lee of giving false testimony in court. He previously claimed that he never received or followed such orders. However, the team discovered surveillance footage that challenges his statements.
That footage allegedly shows Lee speaking with the former prime minister. He appears to be holding a document that may contain the utility shutdown orders. This evidence could directly link him to the execution of those controversial instructions.
As the power abuse case unfolds, the special counsel continues to build its investigation. Authorities recently searched the home of the former minister. They also conducted raids at the Ministry of the Interior and the fire agency’s main office. These actions aim to uncover more documents and electronic records tied to the alleged abuse.
Investigators say Lee’s actions suggest a high risk of repeated offenses. They also fear he might destroy evidence or pressure witnesses. Therefore, they believe his detention is necessary for a fair and thorough investigation.
The Seoul Central District Court will soon hold a hearing to decide on the detention request. The case could mark a major turning point in South Korea’s legal response to political power abuse. The final decision may have significant implications for accountability at the highest levels of government.
