A South Korea arrest hearing for former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo has drawn major attention in Seoul this week. The Seoul Central District Court reviewed serious allegations tied to former President Yoon Suk Yeol’s failed martial law plan. Special counsel Cho Eun-suk’s team pressed for an arrest warrant, citing insurrection, falsification of records, and perjury.
Prosecutors accused Han of helping Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law by urging a Cabinet meeting beforehand. They also charged him with drafting and later destroying a revised proclamation designed to strengthen the decree’s legitimacy. In addition, Han allegedly lied under oath to lawmakers about his awareness of the martial law document.
During the South Korea arrest hearing, investigators highlighted evidence contradicting Han’s testimony at the Constitutional Court and National Assembly. They claimed Han denied knowledge of the martial law document until after the decree was lifted. However, records and testimony from aides suggest he had access much earlier.
If the court grants the warrant, Han will become the third Yoon Cabinet member detained in this scandal. Already, former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun and former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min face charges linked to the same plan. Their arrests mark an expanding investigation that now touches the highest levels of government.
Moreover, the South Korea arrest hearing underscores mounting public anger over corruption and accountability. Many citizens believe the case is crucial for restoring trust in democratic institutions. Political analysts argue the outcome could also influence how future administrations handle national emergencies and executive power.
Meanwhile, rival political parties continue to clash over the investigation’s motives. Supporters of the probe insist it demonstrates the strength of democratic checks and balances. Critics argue it reflects political retaliation rather than impartial justice. The ruling will likely deepen tensions in an already divided political climate.
The court’s decision on Han’s detention could arrive soon, potentially shifting the tone of South Korea’s political discourse. Observers say the ruling will either reinforce public faith in justice or intensify skepticism about political maneuvering. Either way, the case highlights the volatile intersection of law and politics in the country.
