North Korea has introduced strict tourism controls in its new Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Zone Law, signaling a dual approach of economic openness and political restraint. The law highlights Pyongyang’s effort to attract foreign investment while tightening oversight of visitors and locals.
The Supreme People’s Assembly adopted the law during its 35th plenary session in May. The Wonsan-Kalma zone, located on the country’s east coast, covers the Kalma Peninsula and surrounding waters. Officials describe the area as a central hub for international tourism and regional economic growth.
The law offers incentives to foreign investors, including exclusive business rights, duty benefits, and the free movement of foreign currency. However, these measures exist alongside a dense regulatory framework that reinforces strict tourism controls across all operations.
All administrative authority now rests with a single management office overseeing the zone. This office handles business licensing, pricing, taxation, and enforcement, consolidating government control under one body. The structure allows Pyongyang to streamline development while maintaining close political supervision.
Law enforcement agencies must monitor the movement of both foreigners and citizens within the zone. Additionally, communication authorities are required to regulate and oversee all communication activities. These measures reveal North Korea’s commitment to preserving internal security and preventing foreign influence.
Analysts note that the new legal framework marks a departure from earlier models like the Mount Kumgang tourism law. That law permitted open communication and offered looser restrictions. In contrast, the current framework demonstrates Pyongyang’s evolution toward strict tourism controls intended to protect regime stability.
Tourists face several behavioral restrictions under the new provisions. They must follow communication rules, respect public order, and avoid contact with sensitive state facilities. Violations may result in penalties, underscoring the government’s zero-tolerance approach.
Experts believe this dual strategy will attract limited investment while safeguarding regime control. Researcher Hwang Hyun-uk explained that North Korea seeks financial benefits from tourism but fears foreign information flow.
Hwang added that the law reflects “a careful balance between openness and control.” He noted that strict tourism controls could hinder North Korea’s goal of establishing a truly global tourism hub.
Ultimately, the law may encourage economic engagement but within rigid state-defined boundaries. North Korea’s strict tourism controls reinforce its ongoing strategy of selective openness — one that prioritizes political security above all else.
