South Korea Opcon transfer discussions are not included in ongoing negotiations with the United States, the presidential office confirmed. This statement comes as political debate intensifies over potential trade and security deals ahead of the upcoming tariff deadline.
National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac clarified the administration’s position, stating no new talks have begun on the wartime operational control (Opcon) transfer. He emphasized that the South Korea Opcon transfer is not being considered as leverage in any agreements with Washington.
Opcon refers to command authority over combined US and South Korean forces during wartime. At present, a US general leads the Combined Forces Command. Once transferred, a South Korean general would take charge of the future combined operations.
The issue resurfaced after media reports suggested working-level discussions might have resumed. Democratic Party lawmakers added to the controversy by proposing legislative changes if the transfer supports national security interests.
In response, former People Power Party leader Han Dong-hoon warned that pushing for an Opcon transfer could risk the withdrawal of US Forces Korea. He urged the administration to seek public support before pursuing any significant changes.
Wi reiterated that the South Korea Opcon transfer remains a long-term project. He said the process continues under the existing conditions-based transition framework, known as COTP. This framework requires South Korea to strengthen military readiness and ensure favorable regional security conditions.
Presidential officials expressed frustration over politicizing the issue during sensitive trade and security talks. One official said speculation distracts from critical negotiations and could harm relations with Washington. Another described the debate as “unnecessary and disruptive.”
The original agreement to transfer Opcon dates back to 2007, targeting completion by 2012. However, North Korean provocations and security concerns delayed the process. Subsequent administrations maintained the framework, requiring progress on key conditions before any transfer.
Analysts warn that Washington could bring up the South Korea Opcon transfer as a negotiation tool. They note President Lee’s campaign references to “reclaiming Opcon” may have unintentionally fueled speculation and political tension.
A Democratic Party official clarified that Lee’s pledge reflects a commitment to continuing the current transition plan without altering agreements with the United States.
