A major academic survey reveals high satisfaction with public security in Taiwan. Over eighty-six percent of respondents feel safe within their immediate neighborhoods. Consequently, this indicates strong public confidence in localized safety and police presence. Therefore, this data provides a detailed snapshot of perceived public security. National Chung Cheng University’s Crime Research Center conducted the mobile phone survey.
The survey collected three thousand valid samples from across Taiwan. Furthermore, it included residents from outlying islands like Penghu and Kinmen. The research occurred from December eleventh to seventeenth last year. Additionally, the margin of error is plus or minus 1.79 percentage points. These rigorous methods underpin the findings on public security perceptions.
Satisfaction with police work reached 78.72 percent this year. This figure represents the highest level recorded in the past five years. Moreover, community-based police services received particularly strong approval ratings. Over ninety percent support escorts for cash withdrawals and home security checks. These specific services directly enhance feelings of public security.
However, a significant perception gap exists within the survey data. Only 48.56 percent rated wider societal security as good overall. Center head Hsu Hua-fu attributes this to frequent media crime reporting. This disparity highlights how national news can shape public security perceptions differently. Local experience and national narrative often conflict sharply.
Criminology professor Cheng Jui-lung provided crucial context for the results. The survey preceded a deadly stabbing incident in Taipei last December. He also warned high neighborhood satisfaction could foster a false safety sense. Further improvements are needed in traffic and anti-fraud enforcement specifically. These areas remain critical for holistic public security.
The police plan to introduce artificial intelligence tools soon. These technologies aim to improve scam prevention and public awareness. Such innovations could further bolster confidence in systemic public security. The survey ultimately measures perception rather than objective crime statistics. Yet perception is vital for social cohesion and institutional trust.
Future policy should address the gap between local and national security feelings. Enhancing factual public understanding of crime trends may help. Continued investment in community policing seems strongly justified. The high satisfaction scores provide a solid foundation for further reforms. Sustaining this level of public security requires constant adaptation.
In conclusion, the survey presents a largely positive picture of safety in Taiwan. The high marks for police reflect effective community engagement strategies. Yet experts caution against complacency given evolving criminal threats. The commitment to improving traffic and fraud enforcement is essential. Public security remains a cornerstone of societal stability and quality of life.
