TSMC Chair C.C. Wei recently addressed investor concerns by confirming that the US government has no plans to take stake in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). After a dinner meeting with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Wei stated clearly, “They already announced they will not take a stake,” according to Liberty Times. His remarks helped calm market fears that TSMC might be forced into becoming a US government-controlled company.
Investor worries had surged following comments from US President Donald Trump. Trump mentioned that the US government planned to take a 10% stake in Intel under a new agreement. This announcement raised questions about whether similar moves might happen with other semiconductor giants.
However, unlike Intel, the US government has no intention of acquiring shares in TSMC or Micron, The Wall Street Journal reported. Officials explained this decision reflects the fact that both companies are already investing heavily in US manufacturing operations, reducing the need for government ownership.
Furthermore, TSMC clarified that there have never been discussions regarding government shareholding. The company described its ongoing talks with US officials as “smooth and positive,” according to CNA. This statement indicates a cooperative relationship between TSMC and the US government, focused on partnership rather than control.
In addition to TSMC’s official response, Pegatron Chair Tung Tzu-hsien weighed in on the issue. He warned against potential US intervention in corporate governance. Tung argued that major semiconductor firms like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung would thrive better if left to operate under market forces. He believes that government interference might disrupt innovation and growth, rather than support these companies.
Overall, TSMC Chair C.C. Wei’s confirmation that the US has no plans to take stake in TSMC provides much-needed reassurance to investors. The company continues to grow its footprint in the United States through large manufacturing investments. Meanwhile, its relationship with the US government remains collaborative but independent. This development highlights the importance of maintaining market autonomy while fostering international partnerships.
To conclude, the repeated assurance that the US has no plans to take stake in TSMC eases fears about forced government ownership. The chipmaker can now focus on its expansion and innovation efforts without the distraction of ownership concerns. This clarity benefits investors, the semiconductor industry, and the broader tech ecosystem.
