The Korea investigation gained momentum as former Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup appeared before prosecutors. He entered the special counsel’s office in Seoul in the morning. The questioning lasted hours as investigators pressed him on multiple allegations. The probe focuses on political interference in a Marine’s tragic death.
Lee kept his answers short when leaving the office. He told reporters he had already explained everything. He stressed that he had nothing new to add. Despite his remarks, his appearance fueled headlines and public interest. The Korea investigation continues to intensify national debate.
Investigators concentrated on Lee’s sudden trip to Australia. He traveled shortly after becoming ambassador to Canberra. Critics raised concerns about his departure during an active inquiry. Allegations claimed officials helped him leave by lifting his exit ban. Lee strongly denied the claims and dismissed them as absurd.
The special counsel believes government figures shielded Lee from scrutiny. They suspect he left to avoid facing questions. Lee, however, challenged the idea directly. He asked reporters if they truly believed he tried to escape. His lawyer also labeled the accusations delusional. The Korea investigation aims to clarify these disputes.
Prosecutors plan to call Lee again soon. They want answers on the Marine case and the handling of suspects. Reports suggest that interference cleared initial suspects unfairly. Lee first approved the probe results but later reversed them after a call with President Yoon. That reversal triggered more controversy about political involvement.
The case centers on Cpl. Chae Su-geun, who died during a search mission. He entered a dangerous stream without a life vest or safety gear. Heavy rains worsened the mission’s risks. His death shocked the public and raised questions about military safety. Families demanded accountability from defense leaders.
Pressure now grows on former officials as the inquiry unfolds. The Korea investigation highlights political tensions within the country. Observers expect more hearings, debates, and public scrutiny. The case could reshape discussions on military accountability and political influence.
