China on Wednesday accused the United States of hypocrisy over its demand for media reciprocity, charging that Chinese journalists face severe restrictions in America while Beijing has fulfilled its commitments to facilitate US reporters. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning made the remarks after a US State Department spokesperson claimed Washington would not accept China’s continued lack of media reciprocity and alleged Beijing restricts American journalists.
Mao insisted the US itself created the media issue. Since both sides reached three common understandings, China has implemented them fully, including assisting US journalists with visa approvals. In stark contrast, she said, the reporting rights of Chinese journalists in the United States have faced severe curbs.
“White House briefings rarely allow Chinese journalists to raise questions. They often face unexplained delays in visa and residence permit applications. Several journalists have had to return to China. Short-term reporting requests rarely receive approval,” Mao detailed. She then asked, “Is that what the US side means by ‘reciprocity’?”
She further challenged Washington’s free speech commitment, noting that Chinese media outlets have received labels like “foreign agent” or “foreign mission” in the United States. Mao urged concrete US actions to implement the common understandings and guarantee Chinese journalists’ lawful rights.
Beijing’s demand for genuine media reciprocity underscores the enduring tension over press access between the two powers. China maintains it has honored every obligation, while Washington’s actions, including expulsions and bureaucratic hurdles, contradict its rhetoric. The labeling of Chinese media as foreign agents particularly rankles Beijing, which calls it politically motivated.
The issue of media reciprocity has now become a sensitive diplomatic flashpoint. Beijing is expected to continue pushing for the removal of restrictions and the “foreign agent” designations. Meanwhile, Washington shows no immediate sign of easing its stance. Mao’s sharp question — “Is that what the US side means by ‘reciprocity’?” — encapsulates the gap between the two sides’ definitions of fair treatment.
